
The Living Daylights
1987, Action, 2h 10m
58 Reviews 50,000+ RatingsWhat to know
critics consensus
Newcomer Timothy Dalton plays James Bond with more seriousness than preceding installments, and the result is exciting and colorful but occasionally humorless. Read critic reviews
You might also like

Star Trek: Insurrection

The Shadow

Running Scared

Streets of Fire

Licence to Kill
Where to watch
The Living Daylights Photos
Movie Info
British secret agent James Bond (Timothy Dalton) helps KGB officer Georgi Koskov (Jeroen Krabbé) defect during a symphony performance. During his debriefing, Koskov reveals that a policy of assassinating defectors has been instated by new KGB head Leonid Pushkin (John Rhys-Davies). But as Bond explores this threat, a counterplot surfaces, involving a shady American arms dealer (Joe Don Baker) and a pair of Russian assassins, Necros (Andreas Wisniewski) and Kara Milovy (Maryam d'Abo).
Cast & Crew
Timothy Dalton
James Bond
James Bond
Maryam D'Abo
Kara Milovy
Kara Milovy
Jeroen Krabbé
General Georgi Koskov
General Georgi Koskov
Joe Don Baker
Brad Whitaker
Brad Whitaker
John Rhys-Davies
General Leonid Pushkin
General Leonid Pushkin
Art Malik
Kamran Shah
Kamran Shah
Critic Reviews for The Living Daylights
Audience Reviews for The Living Daylights
-
Feb 08, 2016Undeservedly shouldered with a bad reputation that still wrongly scares The Living Daylights out of Bond fans, Timothy Dalton's thrilling 007 debut ushers in a much more serious secret agent whose biggest foe proves to be a noticeable lack of humor. Getting jiggy with the (then) modern age in which AIDS scars the landscape and misogyny is way beyond passé, Bond becomes monogamous and improbably shows less emotion than Daniel Craig's earliest adventures. Still, the excitement and intrigue hit full throttle and rarely let up, allowing for a better-than-average 007 adventure where the explosions suit the story and not vice-versa. If the audience laughed more, this would be one for the ages. In this PG-rated spy thriller, James Bond (Dalton) crosses all seven continents in order to stop an evil arms dealer from starting another world war. Though docked some of Bond's aforementioned defining trademarks, Dalton emerges as more of an action hero in one movie than Roger Moore did during his entire run. His iteration simply wants more for Bond's razor-sharp wit. Thankfully taking the spy game more seriously than eyebrow arching Moore years, The Living Daylights ultimately takes itself too seriously, in need of lightening up during a time when filmgoers were used to intelligent but fun espionage in the pre-9/11 form of The Hunt for Red October as opposed to the deathly intensity in the post-9/11 form of The Bourne Identity. Bottom line: Roll of the DiceyJeff B Super Reviewer
-
Oct 30, 2015For awhile, the Bond films lost the spy elements to the series. Not that there weren't some great installments, there were. But I feel as though The Living Daylights brought the franchise back to its spy roots. The last time a film delved into that was probably The Spy Who Loved Me. And as much as I loved Roger Moore in the role for so long, Timothy Dalton did a fine job as 007. You immediately buy into him as Bond which is something Lazenby really struggled with years before. I also appreciated the pacing of this film. A lot of Bond films over 2 hours are noticably 2 hours. But this film speeds by, and if it weren't for a rough middle act, this would be one of the best of the series. Obviously I'm watching this nearly 30 some odd years after it's release, but I couldn't help but notice the story resemblances to this years Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation. Both being spy movies is a given, but it's opera house scene, along with the leading lady, and its twists and turns all seem to call back to The Living Daylights. But believe me, that's a good thing. I did like Maryam d'Abo as the main Bond girl with something else up her sleeve, but I thought the writing pushed the romance too much with James. Sometimes a women's role in a film doesn't need to feature a romance with the lead character. Other than that, she provided an interesting dynamic with Bond and the rest of the characters. It was nice to see John Rhys-Davies show up although I wish his role would have had more significance. His character tended to get lost in the jumble a bit with all the other secret intelligence that appear here. But again, I think this film benefited from its surprises and unpredictability. Having so many characters keeps us on the edge of our seat as to who makes it and who doesn't. I was also impressed with the writers decision to included certain lines about why this person wasn't going to be killed or why this person needed to be killed. So often in Bond films, I feel as though characters are killed off without real necessity or explanation. That's not the case in The Living Daylights. As if Bond didn't have enough Ski/snow chase sequences, there is yet another one in this film. We have to be nearing double digits at this point. But the action overall is quite impressive. Besides the explosive finale, there wasn't unnecessary special effects or explosions as there usually are. The middle to third act veers off a little bit for about 20 minutes but other than that, it's a well put together film. Maybe it's because it's a different actor, but I feel like this Bond film was much more modernized and didn't seem as dated as previous installments. +Dalton +Great finale +Unpredictable for the most part +Pacing & timely action -Veers off in the middle -Pushed romance 7.3/10Thomas D Super Reviewer
-
Aug 03, 2015Timothy Daltons first Bond is just what the series needed after some terrible entries from Roger Moore, Dalton takes a more serious approach to the role and it works pretty well, It has some good action scenes but they are far few between, The story is much easier to follow and the last half hour was very good, My main fault with the older Bond movies was the silly one liners and corny action, This one had hardly any humour and made the film Better, It's better than most if not all previous instalments, This was a make or break film for Bond and it passed the test.Jamie C Super Reviewer
-
Jun 17, 2013The worst actor to play Bond rescuing the saga with two underrated action-packed adventures. John Glen assumes the responsibility properly and amazes with excellent shooting locations and a surprising cinematography like Gilbert used to do in the past. Fans today argue that the reasons why Timothy Dalton was criticized and ignored in box office terms back in the 80s are the same reasons that people love about Craig's modernized "angry Bond". I say <i>maybe</i>, but Craig is more convincing in his aggressive personification. 70/100Edgar C Super Reviewer
Verified